Club of Rome was one of the periphery topics in my conspiracy lexicon. More of a matter of history alongside Bavarian Illuminati and robber barons. But I overlooked their influence on many of the young people they influenced at the time in the 60’s and 70’s who are in positions of power now like the younger boomers ie Mark Carney, PM of Canada and a few of the “environmentalist” EU leaders. This absolutely falls under the “luxury beliefs” of the elites alongside Harvard grads talking about communism while driving in sports cars to pick up their trust fund cheques.
The Club of Rome’s big “contribution” was a study called the “Limits to Growth” and put that environmental panic out there that there is too many people and too few resources, which in turn let’s loose the sociopaths on a crusade for saving the planet. In reality it’s just another mask of authoritarian control.
Some key takeaways conspiracy wise of the Club of Rome below. Granted lot’s of “think tanks” or “policy groups” are just ways for rich people to avoid paying taxes but some of those influence policy and decision makers so should be scrutinized seriously.
- 10 Kingdoms Map: A 1974 proposal by the club to divide the world into ten regional blocs for better management is often cited in theories as a, “blueprint for authoritarian control” or a, “fulfillment of biblical prophecy“. One common theme among the authoritarian types is a “new world order”. Like Hitler’s “Neuropa”, most of the Communists, George Bush sr, Maurice Strong of Canada , and many many others.
- Depopulation Agenda: Critics interpret their advocacy for sustainable population levels as a covert plan to dramatically reduce global population. This is interesting in that of late there is a large population decline that’s started and it has a lot of western governments in a panic. Again though it’s those luxury beliefs of people who don’t work for a living and live in very closed social systems. Probably a lot of them think they are saving the world and not just being a bunch of social parasites lol. Even in their “saving the world” from whatever calamity it still reflects their holier than thou attitudes in their actions.
- “The First Global Revolution”: the club identifies global crises ,such as climate change, to create a common enemy to unite humanity under a centralized global government.
Here is a really good video from The Sovereign Sphere explaining the Club of Rome’s influence and context today
The 10 Kingdoms Map that the Club of Rome proposed back in 1974. These people want to redraw the world with themselves in control of course. At this point we should just label them as a terrorist organization or at the very least a dangerous cult. Even though they did say to use “non violence” to make it happen that’s never gotten in the way before. Seriously what’s wrong with democracy? It’s got lots of different flavours like ice-cream and most people like it. I for one don’t care for the custard of these would be rulers have on offer. Democracy for them is too messy, too many questions too much accountability. They know what’s better for you and themselves. Or so they seem to think. Pretty much every “utopia” these people plan is built on a pile of skulls. We’re supposed to be modern people, in the west anyways, living decent lives why the big rush to go for Neo-fuedalism or some other dystopian hellscape?
Some think that an environmental revolution would be different but every historical example of any leftist revolution has always resulted in a blood bath. In every single one it was then followed up by a reign of terror to get rid of any “enemies of the revolution” and to terrorize the population into submission. Every single time.
I’m probably yelling into the wind with most of this. Most people don’t give a shit what is going on as long as their is food in their bellies. If your reading this then maybe there’s one small difference I’ve made.
Thanks for tuning in. EvS